Leonardo da Vinci's unfinished work: what the record actually shows

“Leonardo never finished anything” makes a good hook. It also goes further than the evidence. He produced works that have lasted for centuries, and some projects really were left incomplete. The interesting question is not whether a famous person can be turned into an example of procrastination. It is what the surviving objects, commissions and drawings let us say about his working process.

The video above uses Leonardo to talk about curiosity, changing attention and unfinished projects. I understand why that resonates. Plenty of people know the feeling of having a strong idea and struggling to bring every part to a conventional finish. But we cannot diagnose a Renaissance artist from a modern video, and we should not turn the gaps in a 500-year-old record into proof of a particular brain condition. We can look closely at the work and ask better questions about our own.

One commission we can follow

The Uffizi's account of The Adoration of the Magi records a commission from Augustinian monks in 1481. The panel was intended for the high altar of a church outside Florence. Leonardo was to finish it within 30 months. He did not. He left Florence for Milan in 1482, leaving a painting at different stages of completion.

That is a documented unfinished work and a documented move. It does not, by itself, tell us every reason he stopped. The commission, the opportunity in Milan, his methods, the expectations of patrons and other circumstances all belong to a historical question that cannot be reduced to “he got distracted.” The Uffizi's account of the restoration explains that the complexity of the unfinished surface makes it difficult to decipher. It is a record of a process, not a diary entry explaining his state of mind.

The painting matters even unfinished. We can see composition and decisions that would be less visible under a fully completed surface. Restoration and study are ways to understand what is there. Calling the work unfinished is accurate. Calling it worthless, or treating it as a personality test, misses the evidence in front of us.

Another unfinished painting

Leonardo's Saint Jerome is also unfinished. The Vatican Museums presented it as an unfinished masterpiece. The Metropolitan Museum of Art notes that the painting offers an unusual view of Leonardo's creative process, with the surface showing traces that a finished painting might conceal.

Again, the object establishes that a painting was not finished. It does not establish a clinical explanation. We know less about the circumstances of many historical projects than a headline makes it seem. Some reasons may be practical, some artistic, and some unknowable. A careful account makes room for uncertainty instead of filling it with a modern label.

That distinction matters to me because neurodivergent people often have their own work interpreted through a character judgment. A late project becomes “you do not care.” A change of direction becomes “you cannot focus.” The historical record cannot diagnose Leonardo, but it can remind us to ask what happened before deciding what an unfinished result means.

Drawings are work too

The Royal Collection's Leonardo holdings preserve drawings and notebooks that passed to his pupil Francesco Melzi after his death. The collection includes studies across anatomy, landscape, water and natural history. Those materials show close observation and repeated inquiry. They are not simply scraps left behind because a painting was neglected.

We tend to count a finished painting and overlook the investigation that supports it. A drawing can be a study for another object, a way to test an idea, or a record of something noticed. It may be valuable in its own right. If you only count the final deliverable, the work of learning, experimenting and discovering a connection can disappear.

That does not mean every sketch was meant to be a finished masterpiece. It means we should identify the purpose of a piece of work before judging it against a different purpose. A notebook and a commissioned altar painting have different obligations. Leonardo's record includes both. So does a modern person's work: exploration can be useful, while a promise to a client or collaborator still needs a decision about delivery.

What the evidence does not tell us

We do not have a clinical assessment of Leonardo. Modern ADHD criteria were developed centuries later and depend on a person's history and functional impact across contexts. A list of unfinished works is not enough to apply them retrospectively. Nor does movement across subjects prove a particular diagnosis. Curiosity, commissions, patronage, techniques and life circumstances can all shape a career.

It is fine to see a personal connection in the video. “This story makes me think about how I work” is different from “Leonardo definitely had my diagnosis.” The first can open a useful conversation. The second claims knowledge the surviving sources cannot provide. Respect for history and respect for neurodivergent people both call for that distinction.

I would be just as careful with the opposite claim: that someone with ADHD could not have produced such sustained study. ADHD does not erase interest, skill, discipline or the ability to work intensely. Individuals differ. Historical work should not be used as a shortcut to prove or disprove what a modern neurodivergent person can do.

A better way to examine your own unfinished work

If you have a pile of unfinished projects, take one and write down what it actually is. Is it a commitment to another person, an experiment, a hobby, a study, or a task whose purpose has changed? Who is affected if it remains open? What have you already made or learned? These answers are more useful than counting how many things are “incomplete.”

For a commitment, name the next deliverable and the person waiting for it. Perhaps you can narrow the scope, ask for help, renegotiate a date or close the project honestly. For an experiment, ask whether the learning itself was the outcome. You may keep the notes, turn the strongest idea into something smaller, or decide to put it away.

The distinction is not an excuse. It is a way to make responsible decisions without treating curiosity as a flaw. A project can be worth continuing. It can also be worth ending. The difficult part is often allowing yourself to choose, rather than leaving every idea in a state where it quietly asks for attention forever.

Why “finish everything” is a poor rule

Not every idea deserves the same resources. Time, money and attention are limited. Finishing every experiment would mean having no room to test a new direction. Finishing nothing would leave other people waiting and might keep your best ideas from becoming usable. The answer lies in purpose and consequence, not a universal moral rule.

For a creative person, drafts are not only failed final versions. They can be thinking tools. For a researcher, a question that leads elsewhere may still be productive. For a business owner, an abandoned proposal may teach something about the market. None of that removes the need to honor a real obligation. It gives you more than one category for assessing the work.

Try a short review of your open projects. Which one has a real external deadline? Which one still matters deeply to you? Which one contains a piece you could finish in a smaller form? Which one no longer fits your life? There is no special virtue in keeping a project open because closing it feels like admitting failure.

The unfinished surface as a record

Part of the fascination with Leonardo's unfinished paintings is that we can see decisions in progress. The Met's discussion of Saint Jerome points to the view it offers of his creative process. The Uffizi's restoration account likewise treats The Adoration of the Magi as a complex object to study, not a blank absence where a finished image should have been.

Your own drafts can serve a smaller version of that purpose. Keep enough of a record that you can tell what you tried. Write down why you stopped or changed course. When you revisit it, you will have evidence rather than only a feeling that you failed. A sketch, note or prototype may turn out to be the part that matters for your next project.

This is not a comparison between a modern person and Leonardo's achievements. It is a practical lesson from how we read surviving work: look at what exists. A finished object is one kind of evidence. A process leaves evidence too. Neither tells the entire story of the person who made it.

What I would change in the headline

The video's title says Leonardo “never finished anything.” The paintings and records make that too sweeping. What we can say is that he left significant work unfinished and made extensive drawings and studies across disciplines. The shorter line catches attention, but a watch page has room to be more exact. That is why this article names the specific works and links to the institutions that hold or study them.

I still think the underlying question is worth asking: why do we treat a different path through work as a personal defect before we look at the work itself? Sometimes a project needs a clearer deadline. Sometimes the scope was wrong. Sometimes an exploratory path leads to something valuable. You can only tell by examining the case, not by assigning a personality trait from a list of incomplete tasks.

Questions people ask

Did Leonardo da Vinci leave paintings unfinished?

Yes. The Adoration of the Magi at the Uffizi and Saint Jerome at the Vatican Museums are documented unfinished works. The reasons and circumstances differ, and the surviving evidence does not explain every private decision.

Does unfinished work prove Leonardo had ADHD?

No. Historical paintings and notebooks cannot establish a modern diagnosis. It is reasonable to reflect on your own experience when seeing his work, but that is not evidence of Leonardo's clinical history.

Was an unfinished work still valuable?

Yes. The paintings reveal stages of his process and remain significant objects of study. Value and contractual completion are different questions; both can matter.

What should I do with my own unfinished projects?

Separate commitments from experiments. Decide which needs a deliverable, a smaller scope, a conversation with someone affected, or a deliberate ending. Keep a record of what you learned so the work already done is not lost.

Sources and related watching

• Uffizi: The Adoration of the Magi
• Uffizi: restoration and unfinished stages
• Vatican Museums: Saint Jerome
• The Met: Saint Jerome and Leonardo's process
• Leonardo in the Royal Collection

The two linked Leonardo Shorts in the related section offer a faster introduction. This longer page provides the historical context they cannot fit into 30 seconds.

← Return to the Insights Library

Related watching

• Why Leonardo da Vinci Left Projects Unfinished
• Leonardo’s ‘Distractions’ Were His Superpower 🧠✨
• The ADHD Insights of Leonardo Da Vinci Genius Traits